Scientific publication

00:00
Голос Науки
Голос Науки
...
Journal Article
Nov, 2020

From Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) advocacy to interreligious engagement in foreign policy

Fabio Fabio PetitoPetito

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1845098

Author's interview

07:00

Fabio Petito

Abstract

In recent years, Western governments have strengthened their foreign policy tools, global advocacy efforts and international coordination to protect Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB). There is, however, a growing feeling that the current FoRB promotion approaches appear overall to be failing, as religious persecution and discrimination continue to increase in many parts of the world. Criticizing the secular policy mindset embedded in the current approaches, this article argues for a new postsecular foreign policy of religious engagement and advocates a distinctive strategy of “interreligious engagement” illustrating how interreligious dialogue and collaboration can be crucial policy tools to promote FoRB. This strategy is designed to break away from the predominant view among politics-makers in which religious actors are seen either as perpetrators or victims of FoRB violations. Instead, I argue, they should also be seen as responsible partners in combatting intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief.

Full text: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23340460.2020.1845098
InfoAuthorsDiscussions

No discussions yet

Be the first to ask a question or suggest a topic for discussion about this research work.

Start a discussion
Golos Nauki Logo
Home page
Support Project
Sections
Быстрый доступ
  • Author's interview
  • Video Abstracts
Sponsor
* is not an advertisement
Presentation
Information

    Phone: 8 (800) 350 17-24email: office@golos-nauki.ru
    Sign Up
    Information
    Date of publication: 10 Nov, 2020Number of views: 37
    Full text: www.tandfonline.com
    To quote:

    Petito, F. (2020). From Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) advocacy to interreligious engagement in foreign policy. Global Affairs6(3), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1845098

    copied