Scientific publication

00:00
Павел Абрамович Головинский
...
Journal Article
Mar, 2026

The Entropy Barrier: Why Sustainability Demands Space

Павел А. Головинский

PDF

Abstract

We present a thermodynamic framework for quantifying environmental damage based on the entropy production of open systems. Extending the approach of Golovinski et al. (2023), we derive a universal environmental efficiency coefficient $\eta = C_{\text{market}}/(C_{\text{market}} + C_{\text{entropy}})$, where $C_{\text{entropy}}$ is the cost of compensating the entropy generated throughout the full life cycle of a project. The inequality $\eta < 1$ is shown to be a direct consequence of the second law, analogous to the Carnot limit for heat engines. The methodology is applied to compare solar PV and gas turbine equipment production, revealing that at the manufacturing stage gas turbines appear cleaner ($\eta \approx 0.95$ vs. $0.89$), but full life cycle analysis reverses the advantage in favour of solar, especially under IEA decarbonisation scenarios. We also examine data centre siting: mid‑latitudes ($\eta=0.79$), polar regions ($\eta=0.88$) and the Moon ($\eta=0.83$); while polar sites are optimal on Earth, only space‑based centres avoid adding heat to the biosphere, making them globally entropy‑neutral. Protein production efficiency is compared: beef $\eta \approx 0.10$–$0.15$, poultry $0.35$–$0.45$, plant proteins $0.85$–$0.95$, highlighting the thermodynamic advantage of short trophic chains. Nuclear energy analysis shows that traditional open‑fuel‑cycle reactors achieve $\eta \approx 0.68$, whereas the Russian closed‑cycle “Proryv” (BREST‑OD‑300) reaches $\eta \approx 0.93$ – the highest among all considered technologies. Anthropogenic CO$_2$ emissions are placed in context: they are 140–250 times larger than all volcanic emissions combined, and their continuous growth disrupts Earth’s entropy balance. Two fundamental strategies for dealing with entropic pollution are compared – terrestrial isolation versus active dumping into space. We argue that because Earth’s capacity to absorb entropy is finite, expanding the disposal reservoir into space is not a futuristic speculation but a thermodynamic necessity for sustainable civilisation.

InfoAuthorsDiscussions

No discussions yet

Be the first to ask a question or suggest a topic for discussion about this research work.

Start a discussion
Golos Nauki Logo
Home page
Support Project
Sections
Быстрый доступ
  • Author's interview
  • Video Abstracts
Sponsor
* is not an advertisement
Presentation
Information

    Phone: 8 (800) 350 17-24email: office@golos-nauki.ru
    Sign Up
    Information
    Date of publication: 1 Mar, 2026Number of views: 17
    To quote:

    P.A. Golovinski. The Entropy Barrier: Why Sustainability Demands Space

    copied